browser-qa
Teaches your AI agent to test code and catch bugs before users do and design clean, easy-to-use interfaces.
What it does
This agent automatically checks if a website or web application is working correctly after an update. It simulates user actions like clicking links and filling out forms, and verifies if everything looks as expected, including accessibility and loading speed.
When to use it
- ✓After deploying a new feature to a testing environment.
- ✓To ensure important website pages are functioning well.
- ✓Before releasing an update to all users.
Example of what to ask your AI
“Check the demo site at staging.mysite.com and tell me if everything is working well for the release.”
Want more? Open the sections below.
How to use
The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.
Skill link
Ready-to-paste message
How it works
It uses tools that control a real browser to visit pages, check for errors, take 'screenshots' at different sizes, and test if links and forms work. It also checks if the site is accessible to people with disabilities.
Installation
Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.
In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:
npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill browser-qaOr download just the file:
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/affaan-m/ECC/main/skills/browser-qa/SKILL.md -o SKILL.mdTechnical content (original SKILL.md)
Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.
Browser QA — Automated Visual Testing & Interaction
When to Use
- After deploying a feature to staging/preview
- When you need to verify UI behavior across pages
- Before shipping — confirm layouts, forms, interactions actually work
- When reviewing PRs that touch frontend code
- Accessibility audits and responsive testing
How It Works
Uses the browser automation MCP (claude-in-chrome, Playwright, or Puppeteer) to interact with live pages like a real user.
Safety first — blast radius (run read-only by default)
Browser QA drives real auth and real user journeys, so treat the blast radius explicitly. Default to read-only: never run a mutating journey (checkout, payment, delete, mass-update) against a production URL — require an explicit opt-in and a staging/preview URL. Use seeded test credentials, never real production logins, and redact credentials/tokens/PII before saving any screenshot.
Phase 1: Smoke Test
1. Navigate to target URL
2. Check for console errors (filter noise: analytics, third-party)
3. Verify no 4xx/5xx in network requests
4. Screenshot above-the-fold on desktop + mobile viewport
5. Check Core Web Vitals: LCP < 2.5s, CLS < 0.1, INP < 200ms
(INP replaced FID in March 2024; thresholds per web.dev)
Phase 2: Interaction Test
1. Click every nav link — verify no dead links
2. Submit forms with valid data — verify success state
3. Submit forms with invalid data — verify error state
4. Test auth flow: login → protected page → logout (test creds only, never prod)
5. Test critical user journeys (checkout, onboarding, search)
— read-only by default; only exercise mutating journeys against staging
with explicit opt-in (see "Safety first" above)
Phase 3: Visual Regression
1. Screenshot key pages at 3 breakpoints (375px, 768px, 1440px)
2. Compare against committed baseline screenshots
— no baseline ⇒ report INCONCLUSIVE, never a silent PASS
3. Flag layout shifts > 5px, missing elements, overflow
4. Check dark mode if applicable
Phase 4: Accessibility
1. Run axe-core or equivalent on each page
2. Flag WCAG 2.2 AA violations (contrast, labels, focus order)
3. Verify keyboard navigation works end-to-end
4. Check screen reader landmarks
Note: axe-core automatically covers roughly 30–40% of WCAG. A clean run is necessary, not sufficient — keyboard nav, focus order, and a screen-reader pass still need a manual check. Don't report "accessible" from an automated pass alone.
Output Format
## QA Report — [URL] — [timestamp]
### Smoke Test
- Console errors: 0 critical, 2 warnings (analytics noise)
- Network: all 200/304, no failures
- Core Web Vitals: LCP 1.2s ✓, CLS 0.02 ✓, INP 89ms ✓
### Interactions
- [✓] Nav links: 12/12 working
- [✗] Contact form: missing error state for invalid email
- [✓] Auth flow: login/logout working
### Visual
- [✗] Hero section overflows on 375px viewport
- [✓] Dark mode: all pages consistent
### Accessibility
- 2 AA violations: missing alt text on hero image, low contrast on footer links
### Verdict: SHIP WITH FIXES (2 issues, 0 blockers)
# verdict ∈ SHIP / SHIP WITH FIXES / DO NOT SHIP; use INCONCLUSIVE if no visual baseline
Integration
Works with any browser MCP:
mChild__claude-in-chrome__*tools (preferred — uses your actual Chrome)- Playwright via
mcp__browserbase__* - Direct Puppeteer scripts
Pair with /canary-watch for post-deploy monitoring.
FAQ
What are 'Core Web Vitals'?
These are important metrics that measure the user experience regarding page loading speed, interactivity, and visual stability.
What does 'visual regression' mean?
It's comparing a current screen 'screenshot' with a previous one to see if anything has changed visually in an unexpected way.
What is 'axe-core'?
It's a tool that automatically checks if the website follows accessibility guidelines, helping to ensure people with disabilities can use it.
Details
Original description by the author
Run automated post-deploy UI verification with a browser automation MCP (claude-in-chrome, Playwright, or Puppeteer): console-error and Core Web Vitals smoke checks, form and auth-flow interaction tests, screenshot visual regression across three breakpoints, and axe-core accessibility audits ending in a SHIP / DO-NOT-SHIP verdict. Use when testing a deployed feature on staging or preview, before s
repo: affaan-m/ECC
Popularity
- GitHub stars
- 280k
- Ranking position
- #147
- License
- MIT
- Updated
- 10/15/2026
Comments
- …
More skills from this repository
accessibility
Helps your agent create interfaces that everyone can use. Ensures websites and apps work well for people with disabilities, like those who are blind or have reduced mobility.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-architecture-audit
Makes your agent check if everything is working correctly. It finds and fixes problems in AI systems, ensuring they perform as expected.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-eval
Helps your agent compare different AI coding tools. It measures which one is faster, cheaper, and more reliable for specific tasks.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-harness-construction
Makes your agent better understand how to perform tasks. It optimizes the tools and instructions the agent uses to increase its chances of success.
affaan-m/ECC
Similar skills
webapp-testing
Allows testing local web applications, verifying functionality, and debugging interface behavior. Captures screenshots and browser logs.
anthropics/skills
ponytail-audit
Performs a complete code audit. It finds bugs, security flaws, slow code, and suggests what to remove or improve.
DietrichGebert/ponytail
ponytail-review
Reviews the quality of a code change. It checks if the logic is correct, safe, fast, and if all lines are necessary.
DietrichGebert/ponytail