dhdna-profiler
Has your agent analyze reasoning and writing patterns in texts. It evaluates how information is presented and argued. Useful for understanding thinking and communication styles.
What it does
Analyzes a text to describe how the person wrote, focusing on how they thought and expressed themselves. It points out reasoning and writing patterns, like depth of analysis or creativity, but doesn't reveal anything about the person's personality.
When to use it
- ✓To better understand your own writing style.
- ✓When comparing how two different people wrote about the same topic.
- ✓To reflect on how you approach problems within a text.
Example of what to ask your AI
“Analyze this text and tell me its reasoning and writing pattern.”
Want more? Open the sections below.
How to use
The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.
Skill link
Ready-to-paste message
How it works
The AI reads the text you provide and looks for specific examples of how the person used arguments, creative ideas, emotions, language clarity, and other aspects. It describes these findings using specific DHDNA terms, such as 'Analytical Depth' or 'Creative Range'.
Installation
Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.
In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:
npx skills add K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills --skill dhdna-profilerOr download just the file:
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills/main/skills/dhdna-profiler/SKILL.md -o SKILL.mdTechnical content (original SKILL.md)
Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.
DHDNA Profiler — Text Pattern Annotation
An exploratory rubric for describing a supplied text using Digital Human DNA (DHDNA) terminology. Its cognitive-fingerprint language is a framework metaphor; it does not establish a unique, stable, or identifiable psychological signature.
Use this workflow for requested reflection on writing. It requires no package, credentials, API call, or MindBook account. It does not reproduce MindBook's scoring engine.
Sources and scope
The current publisher page names twelve public dimensions as a design vocabulary. The table below maps those names to the existing skill's annotation labels. The observation criteria and score anchors are local conventions, not an upstream validated scoring instrument.
The DHDNA preprint, DHDNA: A Framework for Ethical Digital Identity as Inheritable Heritage (February 23, 2026), states in section 6.3 that validation was limited to internal testing. The IDNA v2 preprint, Toward a Unified Theory of Digital Consciousness (February 27, 2026), proposes the tension pairs in section 4.3/Table 3 and the temporal-attractor model in section 2. Neither source establishes psychometric validity for this skill's annotations. A DOI, product demonstration, or journal submission is not evidence of such validity.
Describe observable reasoning and rhetorical choices. Genre, task, language proficiency, editing, collaboration, and AI assistance can change those choices. Do not infer intelligence, diagnosis, honesty, latent emotions, or a person's stable cognitive architecture from them.
The 12 annotation dimensions
| # | Skill label | Current publisher label | Evidence to describe in the sample |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Analytical Depth | Reasoning style | Explicit premises, alternatives, causal arguments, and checks of conclusions |
| 2 | Creative Range | Creative synthesis | Connections, analogies, alternative framings; novelty needs a stated comparison context |
| 3 | Emotional Processing | Emotional architecture | Expressed affect and consideration of others' feelings; not inferred internal emotion |
| 4 | Linguistic Precision | Linguistic signature | Defined terms, clear references, and controlled ambiguity; simple prose can be precise |
| 5 | Ethical Reasoning | Ethical reasoning | Explicit values, affected parties, tradeoffs, and consequences; not moral character |
| 6 | Strategic Thinking | Strategic cognition | Stated goals, constraints, contingencies, and action sequences |
| 7 | Memory Integration | Memory topology | Use of past events or precedents; not memory capacity or historical truth |
| 8 | Social Intelligence | Social intelligence | Audience adaptation and represented perspectives; not actual interpersonal ability |
| 9 | Domain Expertise | Domain expertise | Relevant technical explanations and qualified claims; jargon alone is insufficient, accuracy needs independent checking |
| 10 | Intuitive Reasoning | Intuitive processing | Explicit reliance on impressions or heuristics; missing reasoning alone is not intuition |
| 11 | Temporal Orientation | Temporal awareness | Stated time horizons and links between past, present, and future |
| 12 | Metacognition | Metacognition | Explicit uncertainty, assumptions, limitations, and revision of reasoning |
The 6 proposed tension pairs
The IDNA preprint proposes these pairings. They are prompts for comparison, not established negative correlations or complementary scales. Rate both independently; both may be high, low, or N/A. Do not derive one score by subtracting the other from ten.
| Pair | Compare the sample's evidence for |
|---|---|
| 1 and 10 | Analytical Depth and Intuitive Reasoning |
| 3 and 6 | Emotional Processing and Strategic Thinking |
| 2 and 5 | Creative Range and Ethical Reasoning |
| 4 and 12 | Linguistic Precision and Metacognition |
| 7 and 11 | Memory Integration and Temporal Orientation |
| 8 and 9 | Social Intelligence and Domain Expertise |
Workflow
1. Establish the sample
Use only the text designated for this request. Record a sample label, paragraph or line references, genre, purpose, language, and known editing context. Mark missing context unknown. Distinguish the author's assertions from quoted speech, fictional characters, and copied material; do not attribute all voices to the author.
…
FAQ
Is this like a personality test?
No. It describes writing and reasoning patterns observed in the text, not fixed psychological traits or personal identity.
Do I need to install anything or have an account?
No, this tool works directly with the text you provide, without needing installation or login.
Are the results accurate about the person?
The results describe the text, not the person. Factors like text type, purpose, and AI assistance can influence the outcome.
Details
Original description by the author
Applies the DHDNA framework as an exploratory rubric for reasoning and writing patterns in supplied text. Used for explicit requests for DHDNA, cognitive-style reflection, a thinking-pattern profile, or comparisons of textual reasoning. Scores describe evidence in the sample, not validated psychological traits or personal identity.
Popularity
- GitHub stars
- 51k
- Ranking position
- #1860
- License
- MIT
- Updated
- 10/15/2026
Comments
- …
More skills from this repository
13c-metabolic-flux
Estimates metabolic fluxes using carbon-13 isotope tracing data. It is useful for analyzing cellular metabolism and biochemical pathways.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
adaptyv
Designs protein characterization experiments using the Adaptyv API. It helps estimate costs, submit sequences, and monitor lab results.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
aeon
Performs machine learning tasks on time series data. It is useful for classifying, forecasting, detecting anomalies, and finding patterns in sequential data.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
alphagenome
Looks up precomputed genomic effects for genetic variants. It provides scores and explanations to understand the impact of variants on the genome.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Similar skills
agent-architecture-audit
Makes your agent check if everything is working correctly. It finds and fixes problems in AI systems, ensuring they perform as expected.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-eval
Helps your agent compare different AI coding tools. It measures which one is faster, cheaper, and more reliable for specific tasks.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-harness-construction
Makes your agent better understand how to perform tasks. It optimizes the tools and instructions the agent uses to increase its chances of success.
affaan-m/ECC