agent-owasp-compliance
Makes your agent check other agents' code against security risks. It helps ensure compliance with security standards.
What it does
This tool checks if an AI agent's code follows security best practices defined by OWASP. It looks for 10 common risk types in AI agents that can act on your behalf.
When to use it
- ✓Before putting an AI system into production.
- ✓To ensure the AI system follows security standards.
- ✓When reviewing the security of an AI system.
Example of what to ask your AI
“Check my AI agent code against the OWASP Top 10 security risks.”
Want more? Open the sections below.
How to use
The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.
Skill link
Ready-to-paste message
How it works
The tool analyzes your code for patterns indicating the presence or absence of security controls for each of the 10 risks. It generates a report showing which risks are covered.
Installation
Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.
In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill agent-owasp-complianceOr download just the file:
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/awesome-copilot/main/skills/agent-owasp-compliance/SKILL.md -o SKILL.mdTechnical content (original SKILL.md)
Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.
Agent OWASP ASI Compliance Check
Evaluate AI agent systems against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 — the industry standard for agent security posture.
Overview
The OWASP ASI Top 10 defines the critical security risks specific to autonomous AI agents — not LLMs, not chatbots, but agents that call tools, access systems, and act on behalf of users. This skill checks whether your agent implementation addresses each risk.
Codebase → Scan for each ASI control:
ASI-01: Prompt Injection Protection
ASI-02: Tool Use Governance
ASI-03: Agency Boundaries
ASI-04: Escalation Controls
ASI-05: Trust Boundary Enforcement
ASI-06: Logging & Audit
ASI-07: Identity Management
ASI-08: Policy Integrity
ASI-09: Supply Chain Verification
ASI-10: Behavioral Monitoring
→ Generate Compliance Report (X/10 covered)
The 10 Risks
| Risk | Name | What to Look For |
|---|---|---|
| ASI-01 | Prompt Injection | Input validation before tool calls, not just LLM output filtering |
| ASI-02 | Insecure Tool Use | Tool allowlists, argument validation, no raw shell execution |
| ASI-03 | Excessive Agency | Capability boundaries, scope limits, principle of least privilege |
| ASI-04 | Unauthorized Escalation | Privilege checks before sensitive operations, no self-promotion |
| ASI-05 | Trust Boundary Violation | Trust verification between agents, signed credentials, no blind trust |
| ASI-06 | Insufficient Logging | Structured audit trail for all tool calls, tamper-evident logs |
| ASI-07 | Insecure Identity | Cryptographic agent identity, not just string names |
| ASI-08 | Policy Bypass | Deterministic policy enforcement, no LLM-based permission checks |
| ASI-09 | Supply Chain Integrity | Signed plugins/tools, integrity verification, dependency auditing |
| ASI-10 | Behavioral Anomaly | Drift detection, circuit breakers, kill switch capability |
Check ASI-01: Prompt Injection Protection
Look for input validation that runs before tool execution, not after LLM generation.
import re
from pathlib import Path
def check_asi_01(project_path: str) -> dict:
"""ASI-01: Is user input validated before reaching tool execution?"""
positive_patterns = [
"input_validation", "validate_input", "sanitize",
"classify_intent", "prompt_injection", "threat_detect",
"PolicyEvaluator", "PolicyEngine", "check_content",
]
negative_patterns = [
r"eval\(", r"exec\(", r"subprocess\.run\(.*shell=True",
r"os\.system\(",
]
# Scan Python files for signals
root = Path(project_path)
positive_matches = []
negative_matches = []
for py_file in root.rglob("*.py"):
content = py_file.read_text(errors="ignore")
for pattern in positive_patterns:
if pattern in content:
positive_matches.append(f"{py_file.name}: {pattern}")
for pattern in negative_patterns:
if re.search(pattern, content):
negative_matches.append(f"{py_file.name}: {pattern}")
positive_found = len(positive_matches) > 0
negative_found = len(negative_matches) > 0
return {
"risk": "ASI-01",
"name": "Prompt Injection",
"status": "pass" if positive_found and not negative_found else "fail",
"controls_found": positive_matches,
"vulnerabilities": negative_matches,
"recommendation": "Add input validation before tool execution, not just output filtering"
}
What passing looks like:
# GOOD: Validate before tool execution
result = policy_engine.evaluate(user_input)
if result.action == "deny":
return "Request blocked by policy"
tool_result = await execute_tool(validated_input)
What failing looks like:
# BAD: User input goes directly to tool
tool_result = await execute_tool(user_input) # No validation
Check ASI-02: Insecure Tool Use
Verify tools have allowlists, argument validation, and no unrestricted execution.
What to search for:
- Tool registration with explicit allowlists (not open-ended)
- Argument validation before tool execution
- No
subprocess.run(shell=True)with user-controlled input - No
eval()orexec()on agent-generated code without sandbox
Passing example:
ALLOWED_TOOLS = {"search", "read_file", "create_ticket"}
def execute_tool(name: str, args: dict):
if name not in ALLOWED_TOOLS:
…
FAQ
What are the OWASP ASI Top 10 risks?
These are the 10 most critical security risks identified specifically for autonomous AI agents, which can interact with systems and perform actions.
What is an 'AI agent'?
It's an AI program that not only understands commands but can also use tools, access systems, and act on behalf of the user to complete tasks.
What is 'Prompt Injection'?
It's an attack where a malicious user tries to trick the AI agent into executing unwanted commands or revealing sensitive information, often through special instructions in the prompt.
Details
Original description by the author
Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent frame
repo: github/awesome-copilot
Popularity
- GitHub stars
- 40k
- Ranking position
- #4986
- License
- MIT
- Updated
- 10/15/2026
Comments
- …
More skills from this repository
acquire-codebase-knowledge
Helps your agent understand and document an existing code project. It's useful for onboarding new people or getting an overview of the architecture.
github/awesome-copilot
acreadiness-assess
Enables your agent to assess a project's readiness for AI and generate a report. It's useful for understanding how well a project is prepared to use AI tools.
github/awesome-copilot
acreadiness-generate-instructions
Helps your agent create instructions for AI tools based on an assessment. It's useful for improving how AI interacts with code and closing identified gaps.
github/awesome-copilot
acreadiness-policy
Enables your agent to help define or apply policies for AI project assessment. It's useful for standardizing how projects are evaluated and ensuring compliance.
github/awesome-copilot
Similar skills
agent-architecture-audit
Makes your agent check if everything is working correctly. It finds and fixes problems in AI systems, ensuring they perform as expected.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-eval
Helps your agent compare different AI coding tools. It measures which one is faster, cheaper, and more reliable for specific tasks.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-harness-construction
Makes your agent better understand how to perform tasks. It optimizes the tools and instructions the agent uses to increase its chances of success.
affaan-m/ECC