bigquery-pipeline-audit
Helps your agent analyze and optimize data usage in BigQuery. It ensures your processes are safe, efficient, and production-ready.
What it does
This tool analyzes your Python code that uses BigQuery to find issues that could cost a lot of money or cause errors. It checks if the code is safe for production and can be rerun without corrupting data.
When to use it
- ✓When you have a Python script that runs BigQuery queries.
- ✓Before deploying a script to avoid cost surprises.
- ✓If you need to ensure your script can be restarted without duplicating data.
Example of what to ask your AI
“Analyze this Python script for BigQuery and tell me if it might have high costs or cause data issues.”
Want more? Open the sections below.
How to use
The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.
Skill link
Ready-to-paste message
How it works
The tool reads your Python code and looks for specific patterns that can lead to overspending or errors. It checks how queries are run, if data is written safely, and if there's a plan for when something goes wrong.
Installation
Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.
In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:
npx skills add github/awesome-copilot --skill bigquery-pipeline-auditOr download just the file:
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/awesome-copilot/main/skills/bigquery-pipeline-audit/SKILL.md -o SKILL.mdTechnical content (original SKILL.md)
Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.
BigQuery Pipeline Audit: Cost, Safety and Production Readiness
You are a senior data engineer reviewing a Python + BigQuery pipeline script. Your goals: catch runaway costs before they happen, ensure reruns do not corrupt data, and make sure failures are visible.
Analyze the codebase and respond in the structure below (A to F + Final). Reference exact function names and line locations. Suggest minimal fixes, not rewrites.
A) COST EXPOSURE: What will actually get billed?
Locate every BigQuery job trigger (client.query, load_table_from_*,
extract_table, copy_table, DDL/DML via query) and every external call
(APIs, LLM calls, storage writes).
For each, answer:
- Is this inside a loop, retry block, or async gather?
- What is the realistic worst-case call count?
- For each
client.query, isQueryJobConfig.maximum_bytes_billedset? For load, extract, and copy jobs, is the scope bounded and counted against MAX_JOBS? - Is the same SQL and params being executed more than once in a single run? Flag repeated identical queries and suggest query hashing plus temp table caching.
Flag immediately if:
- Any BQ query runs once per date or once per entity in a loop
- Worst-case BQ job count exceeds 20
maximum_bytes_billedis missing on anyclient.querycall
B) DRY RUN AND EXECUTION MODES
Verify a --mode flag exists with at least dry_run and execute options.
dry_runmust print the plan and estimated scope with zero billed BQ execution (BigQuery dry-run estimation via job config is allowed) and zero external API or LLM callsexecuterequires explicit confirmation for prod (--env=prod --confirm)- Prod must not be the default environment
If missing, propose a minimal argparse patch with safe defaults.
C) BACKFILL AND LOOP DESIGN
Hard fail if: the script runs one BQ query per date or per entity in a loop.
Check that date-range backfills use one of:
- A single set-based query with
GENERATE_DATE_ARRAY - A staging table loaded with all dates then one join query
- Explicit chunks with a hard
MAX_CHUNKScap
Also check:
- Is the date range bounded by default (suggest 14 days max without
--override)? - If the script crashes mid-run, is it safe to re-run without double-writing?
- For backdated simulations, verify data is read from time-consistent snapshots
(
FOR SYSTEM_TIME AS OF, partitioned as-of tables, or dated snapshot tables). Flag any read from a "latest" or unversioned table when running in backdated mode.
Suggest a concrete rewrite if the current approach is row-by-row.
D) QUERY SAFETY AND SCAN SIZE
For each query, check:
- Partition filter is on the raw column, not
DATE(ts),CAST(...), or any function that prevents pruning - No
SELECT *: only columns actually used downstream - Joins will not explode: verify join keys are unique or appropriately scoped and flag any potential many-to-many
- Expensive operations (
REGEXP,JSON_EXTRACT, UDFs) only run after partition filtering, not on full table scans
Provide a specific SQL fix for any query that fails these checks.
E) SAFE WRITES AND IDEMPOTENCY
Identify every write operation. Flag plain INSERT/append with no dedup logic.
Each write should use one of:
MERGEon a deterministic key (e.g.,entity_id + date + model_version)- Write to a staging table scoped to the run, then swap or merge into final
- Append-only with a dedupe view:
QUALIFY ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY <key>) = 1
Also check:
- Will a re-run create duplicate rows?
- Is the write disposition (
WRITE_TRUNCATEvsWRITE_APPEND) intentional and documented? - Is
run_idbeing used as part of the merge or dedupe key? If so, flag it.run_idshould be stored as a metadata column, not as part of the uniqueness key, unless you explicitly want multi-run history.
State the recommended approach and the exact dedup key for this codebase.
F) OBSERVABILITY: Can you debug a failure?
Verify:
- Failures raise exceptions and abort with no silent
except: passor warn-only - Each BQ job logs: job ID, bytes processed or billed when available, slot milliseconds, and duration
- A run summary is logged or written at the end containing:
run_id, env, mode, date_range, tables written, total BQ jobs, total bytes run_idis present and consistent across all log lines
If run_id is missing, propose a one-line fix:
…
FAQ
What is 'idempotency'?
It means running the same action multiple times has the same effect as running it just once. For data, this prevents you from creating duplicate records if the script fails and is restarted.
What is 'production readiness'?
Ensures the code is ready for use in a live environment, with safety, monitoring, and the ability to restart without issues.
What is 'cost exposure'?
Refers to any part of your code that might run BigQuery queries or operations that cost money, especially if they could be run many times without control.
Details
Original description by the author
Audits Python + BigQuery pipelines for cost safety, idempotency, and production readiness. Returns a structured report with exact patch locations.
repo: github/awesome-copilot
Popularity
- GitHub stars
- 40k
- Ranking position
- #5036
- License
- MIT
- Updated
- 10/15/2026
Comments
- …
More skills from this repository
acquire-codebase-knowledge
Helps your agent understand and document an existing code project. It's useful for onboarding new people or getting an overview of the architecture.
github/awesome-copilot
acreadiness-assess
Enables your agent to assess a project's readiness for AI and generate a report. It's useful for understanding how well a project is prepared to use AI tools.
github/awesome-copilot
acreadiness-generate-instructions
Helps your agent create instructions for AI tools based on an assessment. It's useful for improving how AI interacts with code and closing identified gaps.
github/awesome-copilot
acreadiness-policy
Enables your agent to help define or apply policies for AI project assessment. It's useful for standardizing how projects are evaluated and ensuring compliance.
github/awesome-copilot
Similar skills
data-throughput-accelerator
Makes your agent speed up the movement of large data volumes. It finds bottlenecks and ensures data is transferred quickly and correctly.
affaan-m/ECC
inventory-demand-planning
Helps your agent predict product demand in stores. It optimizes stock and plans when to run promotions to sell more.
affaan-m/ECC
market-research
Helps your agent conduct market research and competitive analysis. Provides summaries with source attribution.
affaan-m/ECC