Skip to content
Skillpedia
Security35k · #5858

implementing-continuous-security-validation-with-bas

Teaches your AI agent to protect apps against attacks and ship projects and manage infrastructure.

What it does

This tool automates security tests by simulating real attacks on your system. It checks if your defenses (like antivirus and firewalls) are working well against known threats.

When to use it

  • ✓When you want to continuously test your security defenses.
  • ✓When setting up new protections and wanting to verify they work.
  • ✓To simulate how a hacker would attack your network and see if you're caught.

Example of what to ask your AI

“Simulate a phishing attack and see if my antivirus detects it.”

Want more? Open the sections below.

How to use

The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.

Skill link

https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/blob/main/skills/implementing-continuous-security-validation-with-bas/SKILL.md

Ready-to-paste message

Use this skill to help me: https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/blob/main/skills/implementing-continuous-security-validation-with-bas/SKILL.md Read the SKILL.md file at that link and follow its instructions for my task.
How it works

The tool uses programs to simulate attacks (like sending fake emails or trying to access files). It then checks if your security tools identified and blocked these simulations.

Installation

Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.

In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:

npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill implementing-continuous-security-validation-with-bas

Or download just the file:

curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/main/skills/implementing-continuous-security-validation-with-bas/SKILL.md -o SKILL.md
Technical content (original SKILL.md)

Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.

Implementing Continuous Security Validation with BAS

Overview

Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) is an automated, continuous approach to validating security control effectiveness by safely executing real-world attack techniques against production security infrastructure. Unlike traditional penetration testing (point-in-time), BAS platforms continuously simulate threats mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, testing endpoint protection, network security, email gateways, SIEM detection, and incident response capabilities. Leading platforms include SafeBreach, AttackIQ, Picus Security (2024 Gartner Customers' Choice), Cymulate, Pentera, and SCYTHE. BAS 2.0 solutions safely emulate real attacker behavior across the entire IT environment without requiring pre-deployed agents on every endpoint.

When to Use

  • When deploying or configuring implementing continuous security validation with bas capabilities in your environment
  • When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
  • When building or improving security architecture for this domain
  • When conducting security assessments that require this implementation

Prerequisites

  • BAS platform license (SafeBreach, AttackIQ, Picus, Cymulate, or Pentera)
  • Deployed security controls to validate (EDR, NGFW, email gateway, SIEM, WAF)
  • MITRE ATT&CK framework familiarity
  • Network segments accessible by BAS agents/simulators
  • Security operations team to act on validation results
  • Change management approval for running simulations in production

Core Concepts

BAS vs Traditional Security Testing

Aspect BAS Penetration Testing Red Team
Frequency Continuous/scheduled Annual/quarterly Annual
Automation Fully automated Manual with tools Manual
Scope Full kill chain Specific targets Goal-oriented
Safety Safe simulation, no exploitation Controlled exploitation Real exploitation
Coverage Thousands of techniques Hundreds of tests Focused scenarios
Output Control gap analysis Vulnerability report Narrative report
Cost model Subscription Per engagement Per engagement

MITRE ATT&CK Coverage Mapping

Tactic Example BAS Simulations Controls Tested
Initial Access Phishing payload delivery, exploit public apps Email gateway, WAF, IPS
Execution PowerShell, WMI, malicious macros EDR, application control
Persistence Registry run keys, scheduled tasks, services EDR, SIEM detection rules
Privilege Escalation Token manipulation, UAC bypass EDR, PAM, SIEM
Defense Evasion Process injection, obfuscation, timestomping EDR, behavioral analytics
Credential Access Mimikatz, Kerberoasting, LSASS dump EDR, credential guard
Discovery AD enumeration, network scanning SIEM, NDR
Lateral Movement PsExec, WMI, RDP, SMB NDR, microsegmentation
Collection Screen capture, keylogging, email collection DLP, UEBA
Exfiltration HTTP/DNS exfil, cloud storage upload DLP, CASB, proxy
Command & Control C2 beaconing, DNS tunneling, encrypted channels NGFW, proxy, NDR

Security Control Validation Score

Control Effectiveness = (Attacks Prevented + Attacks Detected) / Total Attacks Simulated * 100

Example:
  Total simulations:  500
  Prevented (blocked): 350
  Detected (alerted):  100
  Missed (no action):   50

  Prevention Rate: 350/500 = 70%
  Detection Rate:  100/500 = 20%
  Overall Score:   450/500 = 90%
  Gap Rate:         50/500 = 10%

Workflow

Step 1: Deploy BAS Platform Components

Architecture:
  Management Console (Cloud SaaS):
    - Central orchestration and reporting
    - Attack scenario library management
    - MITRE ATT&CK mapping dashboard

  Simulation Agents:
    - Attacker Agent: Simulates threat actor behavior
    - Target Agent: Receives simulated attacks
    - Network Agent: Tests network-level controls

  Deploy agents across zones:
    - Corporate network (workstations)
    - DMZ (web servers)
    - Data center (critical servers)
    - Cloud environments (AWS/Azure/GCP)
    - Remote/VPN segment

Step 2: Configure Attack Scenarios

# Example BAS scenario configuration
scenario:
  name: "APT29 (Cozy Bear) Full Kill Chain"
  threat_group: APT29
  mitre_attack_techniques:
    - T1566.001  # Spearphishing Attachment
    - T1059.001  # PowerShell Execution

…
FAQ

What's the difference between this and penetration testing (pentest)?

Penetration tests are done once, like a snapshot. This tool performs continuous tests, like a video, checking your defenses all the time.

Do I need to install something on every computer?

Not necessarily. Newer versions don't require installation everywhere; they simulate attacks more broadly.

What are 'MITRE ATT&CK techniques'?

It's a catalog of how hackers typically attack. The tool uses these known techniques to simulate realistic attacks.

Details

Original description by the author

Deploys Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) platforms such as SafeBreach, AttackIQ, Picus, Cymulate, Pentera, or SCYTHE to continuously validate endpoint, network, email-gateway, SIEM, and incident-response effectiveness by safely emulating MITRE ATT&CK techniques. Use when moving beyond point-in-time pentesting to continuous control validation, or standing up automated adversary emulation.

repo: mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

Popularity

GitHub stars
35k
Ranking position
#5858
License
Apache-2.0
Updated
8/31/2026

Is this skill useful?

0

Sign in to vote.

Comments

  • …

More skills from this repository

Similar skills