managing-third-party-vendor-risk
Helps your agent assess and manage security risks posed by third-party vendors.
What it does
This tool helps manage the security risks of companies you hire (vendors). It organizes who your vendors are, assesses the risk each one poses, and ensures they follow security rules, from onboarding to service termination.
When to use it
- ✓When hiring a new vendor who will handle important data.
- ✓When organizing a program to manage risks for all vendors.
- ✓When reviewing a vendor's security documents, like SOC 2 reports.
Example of what to ask your AI
“How can I assess the security risk of a new software vendor?”
Want more? Open the sections below.
How to use
The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.
Skill link
Ready-to-paste message
How it works
The tool first lists all your vendors and categorizes them by risk level. It then guides you in requesting and reviewing security documents, such as questionnaires and reports, to ensure they meet your requirements before and during the use of their services.
Installation
Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.
In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill managing-third-party-vendor-riskOr download just the file:
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/main/skills/managing-third-party-vendor-risk/SKILL.md -o SKILL.mdTechnical content (original SKILL.md)
Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.
Managing Third-Party Vendor Risk
When to Use
- When assessing a new vendor before onboarding, especially one that will handle sensitive data, connect to your network, or be embedded in a critical process.
- When standing up or maturing a third-party risk management (TPRM) program and you need a repeatable tiering + assessment workflow.
- When tiering an existing vendor portfolio so effort matches risk.
- When reviewing vendor evidence — a SOC 2 Type II report, ISO 27001 certificate, CAIQ, or pen-test summary — and you need to know what to look for.
- When writing security and privacy requirements into a contract / DPA, including breach-notification SLAs and right-to-audit.
- When a vendor (or their subcontractor) suffers a breach and you must assess exposure.
- When managing software supply-chain and Nth-party (fourth-party and beyond) risk.
Prerequisites
- A vendor inventory (who you use, for what, and what data/access each has).
- A defined risk-tiering model (criteria and thresholds) agreed with the business.
- Access to standardized questionnaires (Shared Assessments SIG, CSA CAIQ) and a way to collect evidence.
- Clarity on your own regulatory obligations that flow down to vendors (e.g., HIPAA BAAs, CMMC flowdown, GDPR processor terms, PCI).
- Stakeholders identified: procurement, legal, security, data owner, and the business sponsor.
Workflow
1. Inventory and classify vendors
Catalog every third party and capture: data sensitivity handled, type of access (network, physical, none), business criticality, and regulatory scope. You cannot manage what you have not inventoried — shadow vendors are a common blind spot.
2. Tier by inherent risk
Score each vendor on inherent-risk factors (data sensitivity, access, criticality, regulatory scope, spend/concentration) and assign a tier (e.g., Critical / High / Moderate / Low). The tier drives how deep the assessment goes and how often you reassess. A payroll processor with PII and system access is not the same risk as a stock-photo subscription.
3. Run tier-appropriate due diligence
- Critical/High: full SIG (or SIG Core), request SOC 2 Type II and/or ISO 27001, recent pen-test summary, and evidence of an incident-response capability. Consider an assessor call.
- Moderate: SIG Lite or CAIQ, plus key attestations.
- Low: lightweight questionnaire / self-attestation.
4. Review evidence critically
Don't just collect — read:
- SOC 2 Type II: check scope, the Trust Services Criteria covered, the audit period (not just the date), and especially the exceptions/deviations and any qualified opinion. A clean cover page can hide noted exceptions.
- ISO 27001: confirm the scope statement and the Statement of Applicability actually cover the service you're buying.
- CAIQ: look for "no" answers and CCM domains left blank.
- Pen-test: age, scope, and whether highs/criticals were remediated.
5. Identify gaps and decide
Compare findings against your control requirements. For each gap: accept, require remediation (with a date), add a compensating control on your side, or walk away. Record the residual risk and a risk-owner decision.
6. Codify in the contract / DPA
Bake requirements into the agreement: security control obligations, breach-notification timeline, data-handling and return/destruction terms, right-to-audit / right to assessment evidence, subcontractor (Nth-party) flowdown, and liability/insurance. Contracts are where TPRM gets teeth.
7. Monitor continuously
Tiering is not a one-time gate. For higher tiers: periodic reassessment, security-ratings feeds, breach/news monitoring, certificate-expiry tracking, and watching for material changes (acquisition, region change, new subprocessors). Re-tier on change.
8. Manage Nth-party and concentration risk
Map critical fourth parties (your vendor's key subprocessors) and watch for concentration (many vendors riding on the same upstream provider) — a single upstream outage or breach can hit your whole portfolio at once.
9. Offboard securely
On termination: revoke access and credentials, confirm data return or certified destruction, remove integrations/API keys, and update the inventory. Un-offboarded vendors are standing risk.
Key Concepts
| Concept | Definition |
|---|
…
FAQ
What is 'inherent risk'?
It's the risk a vendor poses before any security measures are applied. It helps decide how rigorous the assessment should be.
What are 'SIG' and 'CAIQ'?
These are standardized questionnaires that vendors fill out to show how they handle information security.
What does 'Nth-party risk' mean?
It refers to the risk coming from your vendors' vendors (the indirect supply chain). If a vendor of your vendor has a problem, it can affect you.
Details
Original description by the author
Build and run a third-party/vendor risk management (TPRM) program aligned to NIST SP 800-161 C-SCRM: inventory and tier vendors, issue SIG/CAIQ questionnaires, review SOC 2/ISO 27001 evidence, set contractual right-to-audit clauses, monitor vendors continuously, and offboard securely. Use when assessing a new vendor, standing up a vendor-risk program, tiering a portfolio, reviewing a SOC 2/CAIQ, o
Popularity
- GitHub stars
- 35k
- Ranking position
- #5994
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Updated
- 8/31/2026
Comments
- …
More skills from this repository
abusing-dpapi-for-credential-access
Gives your AI agent ready-made instructions for a specific task, so it does it better and faster.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
abusing-shadow-credentials-for-privesc
Teaches your AI agent to write clear, well-structured text.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance
Helps your agent prepare an environment for CMMC Level 2 compliance. It implements security requirements and manages necessary documentation.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd
Helps your agent create exact copies of hard drives. This is useful for ensuring no information is lost or altered during investigations.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Similar skills
dashboard-builder
Helps your agent create useful monitoring dashboards. It turns data into charts that answer important system questions.
affaan-m/ECC
dev-team
Simulates a collaborative development team where different roles respond to a problem together. It's useful for getting multiple perspectives without manually switching agents.
affaan-m/ECC
ecc-council
Has your agent convene a four-voice council for difficult decisions. It's useful when there are multiple good options and debate is needed before choosing.
affaan-m/ECC