Skip to content
Skillpedia
Misc35k · #6007

performing-access-review-and-certification

Helps your agent verify and approve user access. It's useful for ensuring security and compliance with laws and standards.

What it does

This tool helps verify that people have the correct permissions to access systems and data, according to their job roles within a company. It ensures that only those who need access actually have it, to comply with security rules and laws.

When to use it

  • ✓When you need to review who has access to what in important systems.
  • ✓When preparing for a security or compliance audit.
  • ✓Periodically, to ensure accesses still make sense for each person's job.

Example of what to ask your AI

“Review access to financial and customer systems to ensure only authorized personnel have access.”

Want more? Open the sections below.

How to use

The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.

Skill link

https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/blob/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/SKILL.md

Ready-to-paste message

Use this skill to help me: https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/blob/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/SKILL.md Read the SKILL.md file at that link and follow its instructions for my task.
How it works

The tool organizes a process where managers or system owners confirm if each listed person truly needs that access. It tracks who reviewed, who approved or denied, and ensures improper accesses are removed.

Installation

Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.

In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:

npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certification

Or download just the file:

curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/SKILL.md -o SKILL.md
Technical content (original SKILL.md)

Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.

Performing Access Review and Certification

Overview

Conduct systematic access reviews and certifications to ensure users have appropriate access rights aligned with their roles. This skill covers review campaign design, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification strategies, and remediation tracking for compliance with SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS requirements.

When to Use

  • When conducting security assessments that involve performing access review and certification
  • When following incident response procedures for related security events
  • When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
  • When validating security controls through hands-on testing

Prerequisites

  • Familiarity with identity access management concepts and tools
  • Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
  • Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
  • Appropriate authorization for any testing activities

Objectives

  • Design and execute access review campaigns across enterprise applications
  • Implement risk-based prioritization for review scope
  • Configure reviewer selection (manager, application owner, hybrid)
  • Automate entitlement data collection and presentation
  • Track remediation of inappropriate access findings
  • Generate compliance evidence for auditors

Key Concepts

Access Review Types

  1. User Access Review: Manager certifies all entitlements for their direct reports
  2. Entitlement Review: Application owner certifies all users with specific entitlement
  3. Role Review: Role owner certifies role membership and permissions
  4. Privileged Access Review: Security team reviews high-risk/privileged access
  5. SOD Review: Verify no users have conflicting separation-of-duty violations

Risk-Based Prioritization

  • High Risk: Privileged access, financial systems, PII/PHI systems, external-facing apps
  • Medium Risk: Internal business applications, shared drives, collaboration tools
  • Low Risk: Standard employee tools, read-only access, public information systems

Review Campaign Lifecycle

  1. Planning: Define scope, reviewers, timeline, escalation
  2. Data Collection: Aggregate entitlements from all identity sources
  3. Distribution: Assign review items to appropriate certifiers
  4. Certification: Reviewers approve or revoke each entitlement
  5. Remediation: Revoke inappropriate access, enforce timeline
  6. Reporting: Generate compliance evidence and metrics
  7. Closure: Archive campaign, feed findings into next cycle

Workflow

Step 1: Define Review Scope and Schedule

  • Identify in-scope applications and systems
  • Determine review frequency: quarterly (SOX), semi-annual, annual
  • Define campaign timeline: review period, escalation dates, hard close
  • Establish escalation chain for non-responsive reviewers

Step 2: Data Collection and Aggregation

  • Extract user-entitlement mappings from each application
  • Correlate with HR data (active employees, role, department, manager)
  • Identify terminated/transferred users still holding access
  • Flag high-risk entitlements (admin, DBA, system, privileged)
  • Calculate risk scores based on entitlement sensitivity and user role

Step 3: Reviewer Assignment

  • Manager Reviews: Direct manager certifies subordinate access
  • Application Owner Reviews: App owner certifies all users of their application
  • Hybrid Model: Manager reviews standard access, app owner reviews privileged
  • Delegate Management: Allow reviewers to delegate with audit trail

Step 4: Execute Certification Campaign

  • Send notifications to reviewers with clear instructions
  • Present entitlements with context (last used date, risk level, role justification)
  • Require reviewers to explicitly approve or revoke each item
  • Track completion percentage and send reminders
  • Escalate to management after deadline

Step 5: Remediation and Tracking

  • Automatically ticket revocations to IT operations
  • Set SLA for revocation execution (24-48 hours for high-risk)
  • Verify revocation completed (re-check entitlement)
  • Exception management for business-justified deviations
  • Document all exceptions with expiration dates

Step 6: Reporting and Evidence

  • Generate campaign completion metrics
  • Produce per-application compliance reports
  • Create audit-ready evidence packages
  • Track trends across review cycles
  • Feed findings into risk assessment process

Security Controls

…

FAQ

What is an 'access review'?

It's the process of checking and confirming if the permissions people have in the company's systems are still appropriate for their current roles.

Why is reviewing access important?

To prevent improper access that could lead to data breaches, fraud, or non-compliance with laws and regulations, as well as maintaining information security.

Who performs this review?

Typically, direct managers of employees, application owners, or security teams, depending on the type of access being reviewed.

Details

Original description by the author

Designs and runs access review and certification campaigns-scoping, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification, and remediation tracking-to verify user access matches job roles for SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS compliance. Use when planning or executing periodic access recertification or preparing evidence for an IAM compliance audit.

repo: mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills

Popularity

GitHub stars
35k
Ranking position
#6007
License
Apache-2.0
Updated
8/31/2026

Is this skill useful?

0

Sign in to vote.

Comments

  • …

More skills from this repository

Similar skills