performing-access-review-and-certification
Helps your agent verify and approve user access. It's useful for ensuring security and compliance with laws and standards.
What it does
This tool helps verify that people have the correct permissions to access systems and data, according to their job roles within a company. It ensures that only those who need access actually have it, to comply with security rules and laws.
When to use it
- ✓When you need to review who has access to what in important systems.
- ✓When preparing for a security or compliance audit.
- ✓Periodically, to ensure accesses still make sense for each person's job.
Example of what to ask your AI
“Review access to financial and customer systems to ensure only authorized personnel have access.”
Want more? Open the sections below.
How to use
The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.
Skill link
Ready-to-paste message
How it works
The tool organizes a process where managers or system owners confirm if each listed person truly needs that access. It tracks who reviewed, who approved or denied, and ensures improper accesses are removed.
Installation
Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.
In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:
npx skills add mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills --skill performing-access-review-and-certificationOr download just the file:
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/main/skills/performing-access-review-and-certification/SKILL.md -o SKILL.mdTechnical content (original SKILL.md)
Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.
Performing Access Review and Certification
Overview
Conduct systematic access reviews and certifications to ensure users have appropriate access rights aligned with their roles. This skill covers review campaign design, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification strategies, and remediation tracking for compliance with SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS requirements.
When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve performing access review and certification
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Familiarity with identity access management concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
Objectives
- Design and execute access review campaigns across enterprise applications
- Implement risk-based prioritization for review scope
- Configure reviewer selection (manager, application owner, hybrid)
- Automate entitlement data collection and presentation
- Track remediation of inappropriate access findings
- Generate compliance evidence for auditors
Key Concepts
Access Review Types
- User Access Review: Manager certifies all entitlements for their direct reports
- Entitlement Review: Application owner certifies all users with specific entitlement
- Role Review: Role owner certifies role membership and permissions
- Privileged Access Review: Security team reviews high-risk/privileged access
- SOD Review: Verify no users have conflicting separation-of-duty violations
Risk-Based Prioritization
- High Risk: Privileged access, financial systems, PII/PHI systems, external-facing apps
- Medium Risk: Internal business applications, shared drives, collaboration tools
- Low Risk: Standard employee tools, read-only access, public information systems
Review Campaign Lifecycle
- Planning: Define scope, reviewers, timeline, escalation
- Data Collection: Aggregate entitlements from all identity sources
- Distribution: Assign review items to appropriate certifiers
- Certification: Reviewers approve or revoke each entitlement
- Remediation: Revoke inappropriate access, enforce timeline
- Reporting: Generate compliance evidence and metrics
- Closure: Archive campaign, feed findings into next cycle
Workflow
Step 1: Define Review Scope and Schedule
- Identify in-scope applications and systems
- Determine review frequency: quarterly (SOX), semi-annual, annual
- Define campaign timeline: review period, escalation dates, hard close
- Establish escalation chain for non-responsive reviewers
Step 2: Data Collection and Aggregation
- Extract user-entitlement mappings from each application
- Correlate with HR data (active employees, role, department, manager)
- Identify terminated/transferred users still holding access
- Flag high-risk entitlements (admin, DBA, system, privileged)
- Calculate risk scores based on entitlement sensitivity and user role
Step 3: Reviewer Assignment
- Manager Reviews: Direct manager certifies subordinate access
- Application Owner Reviews: App owner certifies all users of their application
- Hybrid Model: Manager reviews standard access, app owner reviews privileged
- Delegate Management: Allow reviewers to delegate with audit trail
Step 4: Execute Certification Campaign
- Send notifications to reviewers with clear instructions
- Present entitlements with context (last used date, risk level, role justification)
- Require reviewers to explicitly approve or revoke each item
- Track completion percentage and send reminders
- Escalate to management after deadline
Step 5: Remediation and Tracking
- Automatically ticket revocations to IT operations
- Set SLA for revocation execution (24-48 hours for high-risk)
- Verify revocation completed (re-check entitlement)
- Exception management for business-justified deviations
- Document all exceptions with expiration dates
Step 6: Reporting and Evidence
- Generate campaign completion metrics
- Produce per-application compliance reports
- Create audit-ready evidence packages
- Track trends across review cycles
- Feed findings into risk assessment process
Security Controls
…
FAQ
What is an 'access review'?
It's the process of checking and confirming if the permissions people have in the company's systems are still appropriate for their current roles.
Why is reviewing access important?
To prevent improper access that could lead to data breaches, fraud, or non-compliance with laws and regulations, as well as maintaining information security.
Who performs this review?
Typically, direct managers of employees, application owners, or security teams, depending on the type of access being reviewed.
Details
Original description by the author
Designs and runs access review and certification campaigns-scoping, reviewer selection, risk-based prioritization, micro-certification, and remediation tracking-to verify user access matches job roles for SOX, HIPAA, and PCI DSS compliance. Use when planning or executing periodic access recertification or preparing evidence for an IAM compliance audit.
Popularity
- GitHub stars
- 35k
- Ranking position
- #6007
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Updated
- 8/31/2026
Comments
- …
More skills from this repository
abusing-dpapi-for-credential-access
Gives your AI agent ready-made instructions for a specific task, so it does it better and faster.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
abusing-shadow-credentials-for-privesc
Teaches your AI agent to write clear, well-structured text.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance
Helps your agent prepare an environment for CMMC Level 2 compliance. It implements security requirements and manages necessary documentation.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd
Helps your agent create exact copies of hard drives. This is useful for ensuring no information is lost or altered during investigations.
mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills
Similar skills
dashboard-builder
Helps your agent create useful monitoring dashboards. It turns data into charts that answer important system questions.
affaan-m/ECC
dev-team
Simulates a collaborative development team where different roles respond to a problem together. It's useful for getting multiple perspectives without manually switching agents.
affaan-m/ECC
ecc-council
Has your agent convene a four-voice council for difficult decisions. It's useful when there are multiple good options and debate is needed before choosing.
affaan-m/ECC