react-testing
Lets your agent write tests for React components. It uses tools to check if everything works correctly, including accessibility.
What it does
Helps test software components built with React. It ensures they work as expected for the end-user by checking what's displayed on the screen and how the user interacts with them.
When to use it
- ✓When creating new React components.
- ✓When fixing issues in existing components.
- ✓To ensure components don't break after changes.
Example of what to ask your AI
“Test the login component to ensure the user can type email and password and click the submit button.”
Want more? Open the sections below.
How to use
The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.
Skill link
Ready-to-paste message
How it works
It uses tools that simulate a browser to render your components and interact with them, as if a real user were using it. This helps find errors before users see them.
Installation
Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.
In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:
npx skills add affaan-m/ECC --skill react-testingOr download just the file:
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/affaan-m/ECC/main/pi/core/skills/react-testing/SKILL.md -o SKILL.mdTechnical content (original SKILL.md)
Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.
React Testing
Comprehensive React testing patterns for behavior-focused component tests, custom hook tests, accessibility assertions, and network-level mocking.
When to Activate
- Writing tests for React components, custom hooks, or pages
- Adding test coverage to legacy untested components
- Migrating from Enzyme or class-component-era patterns to React Testing Library
- Setting up Vitest or Jest for a new React project
- Mocking HTTP requests in tests
- Asserting accessibility violations
- Deciding which tests belong in RTL vs Playwright Component Testing vs full E2E
Core Principle
Test what the user sees and does, not implementation details.
A test should:
- Render the component with the same providers it has in production
- Interact with it via accessible queries (role, label) and
userEvent - Assert visible output and observable side effects (callback fired, request sent)
A test should NOT:
- Inspect component state, props passed to children, or which hooks were called
- Mock React itself or framework hooks
- Assert on the number of renders or DOM structure beyond what affects users
Library Choice
| Runner | When | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Vitest | Vite, Remix, modern setups | Faster, native ESM, Jest-compatible API |
| Jest | Next.js, CRA, established repos | Default for many React projects |
| Playwright Component Testing | Real browser engine needed | Use when JSDOM lacks the required feature |
| Cypress Component Testing | Real browser, Cypress already in use | Alternative to Playwright CT |
Pick one. Do not run RTL + Vitest AND Playwright CT in the same repo unless you have a clear lane separation.
Query Priority
React Testing Library exposes queries in three tiers — use top-down:
- Accessible to everyone:
getByRole,getByLabelText,getByPlaceholderText,getByText,getByDisplayValue - Semantic:
getByAltText,getByTitle - Test IDs (escape hatch):
getByTestId
// Best
screen.getByRole("button", { name: /save/i });
// OK for inputs
screen.getByLabelText("Email");
// Last resort
screen.getByTestId("save-btn");
Variants:
getBy*— throws if no matchqueryBy*— returnsnull(use for "assert absence")findBy*— async, returns a Promise (use for elements that appear after async work)
User Interaction with userEvent
import userEvent from "@testing-library/user-event";
test("submits the form", async () => {
const user = userEvent.setup();
const onSubmit = vi.fn();
render(<UserForm onSubmit={onSubmit} />);
await user.type(screen.getByLabelText("Email"), "user@example.com");
await user.click(screen.getByRole("button", { name: /save/i }));
expect(onSubmit).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ email: "user@example.com" });
});
- Always
awaituserEvent calls - Call
userEvent.setup()once per test, reuse the returneduser userEventsimulates a real browser sequence;fireEventdispatches a single synthetic event — preferuserEvent
Async Patterns
// Element that appears after async work
expect(await screen.findByText("Loaded")).toBeInTheDocument();
// Side effect assertion
await waitFor(() => expect(saveSpy).toHaveBeenCalled());
// Element that should disappear
await waitForElementToBeRemoved(() => screen.queryByText("Loading"));
Never setTimeout + assertion — flaky. Use the matchers above.
Network Mocking with MSW
Mock Service Worker mocks at the network layer. The component, hooks, and fetch library all behave exactly as in production.
Setup
// test/setup.ts
import { setupServer } from "msw/node";
import { http, HttpResponse } from "msw";
export const handlers = [
http.get("/api/users/:id", ({ params }) =>
HttpResponse.json({ id: params.id, name: "Alice" }),
),
http.post("/api/users", async ({ request }) => {
const body = await request.json();
return HttpResponse.json({ id: "new-id", ...body }, { status: 201 });
}),
];
export const server = setupServer(...handlers);
beforeAll(() => server.listen({ onUnhandledRequest: "error" }));
afterEach(() => server.resetHandlers());
afterAll(() => server.close());
Configure onUnhandledRequest: "error" so any unmocked request fails the test loudly — silent passes are worse than red.
Per-test override
test("renders error on 500", async () => {
server.use(
http.get("/api/users/:id", () => new HttpResponse(null, { status: 500 })),
);
render(<UserPage id="1" />);
…
FAQ
What are component tests?
These are automatic checks that simulate the use of a small part of your software (a component) to see if it behaves correctly.
Why test what the user sees and does?
Testing the user experience ensures the software is useful and easy to use, rather than focusing on internal details that might change.
What does 'mocking' a network request mean?
It means simulating a response to an internet call. This allows testing how your component reacts to different responses (success, error) without needing a real connection.
Details
Original description by the author
React component testing with React Testing Library, Vitest/Jest, MSW for network mocking, accessibility assertions with axe, and the decision boundary between component tests and Playwright/Cypress end-to-end runs. Use when writing or fixing tests for React components, hooks, or pages.
repo: affaan-m/ECC
Popularity
- GitHub stars
- 280k
- Ranking position
- #114
- License
- MIT
- Updated
- 10/15/2026
Comments
- …
More skills from this repository
accessibility
Helps your agent create interfaces that everyone can use. Ensures websites and apps work well for people with disabilities, like those who are blind or have reduced mobility.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-architecture-audit
Makes your agent check if everything is working correctly. It finds and fixes problems in AI systems, ensuring they perform as expected.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-eval
Helps your agent compare different AI coding tools. It measures which one is faster, cheaper, and more reliable for specific tasks.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-harness-construction
Makes your agent better understand how to perform tasks. It optimizes the tools and instructions the agent uses to increase its chances of success.
affaan-m/ECC
Similar skills
webapp-testing
Allows testing local web applications, verifying functionality, and debugging interface behavior. Captures screenshots and browser logs.
anthropics/skills
ponytail-audit
Performs a complete code audit. It finds bugs, security flaws, slow code, and suggests what to remove or improve.
DietrichGebert/ponytail
ponytail-review
Reviews the quality of a code change. It checks if the logic is correct, safe, fast, and if all lines are necessary.
DietrichGebert/ponytail