ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking
Helps evaluate AI agents on tasks. Checks if they complete requests, plan well, and use tools correctly. Shows costs. Useful for comparing agent performance and efficiency.
What it does
This tool helps record and compare the performance of different artificial intelligence programs (agents). It measures how well they complete tasks, how accurate they are in using other tools, and how much they cost.
When to use it
- ✓When recording test results for an AI agent with a fixed dataset.
- ✓When comparing a new agent to an existing one under the same conditions.
- ✓When creating checklists in formats like CSV or SQL to track performance.
Example of what to ask your AI
“How can I record and compare the performance of our AI agents?”
Want more? Open the sections below.
How to use
The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.
Skill link
Ready-to-paste message
How it works
You define the evaluation criteria and parameters. Then, the tool helps export the results in standardized formats (like tables or database schemas) for analysis.
Installation
Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.
In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:
npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarkingOr download just the file:
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/main/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking/SKILL.md -o SKILL.mdTechnical content (original SKILL.md)
Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.
AI Agent Capability Evaluation & Benchmarking
What it is: Standardizes multi-metric capability benchmarking, token cost efficiency, and regression monitoring across autonomous coding agents.
Overview
Provides a standardized, auditable framework and data model for AI Agent Capability Evaluation & Benchmarking operations across distributed engineering and decentralized application systems.
When to Use This Skill
- When recording agent evaluation runs with a fixed dataset, rubric, runtime/model revision and measured outcomes.
- When comparing a candidate with a baseline under matched tasks, environment, tool permissions and cost accounting.
- When generating reproducible CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, and Notion property registers for tracking compliance.
How It Works
- Define the parameters, thresholds, and identity bindings required for the target operational register.
- Select appropriate boundary enforcement values from validated enum select sets.
- Export standardized artifacts (CSV table, SQL DDL, JSON Schema) to integrate into validation CI pipelines.
Field Reference
| # | Field Name | Type | SQL Type | JSON Schema Type | Notion Property Type | Example Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benchmark Run ID | id |
SERIAL PRIMARY KEY |
integer |
Text | 1 |
| 2 | Evaluated Agent Model | select |
VARCHAR(64) |
string |
Select | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
| 3 | Benchmark Suite Domain | select |
VARCHAR(64) |
string |
Select | SWE-bench Verified |
| 4 | Tasks Evaluated Count | number |
INTEGER |
integer |
Number | 100 |
| 5 | Pass Rate Percentage | number |
NUMERIC(5,2) |
number |
Number | 78.40 |
| 6 | Tool Hallucination Rate % | number |
NUMERIC(5,2) |
number |
Number | 0.60 |
| 7 | Average Tokens Per Task | number |
INTEGER |
integer |
Number | 42500 |
| 8 | Cost Per Solved Task USD | currency |
NUMERIC(8,4) |
number |
Number | 0.3420 |
| 9 | Regression Verdict | select |
VARCHAR(32) |
string |
Select | Superior |
| 10 | Evaluation Lead | text |
VARCHAR(64) |
string |
Text | Ranjeet2063 |
| 11 | Benchmark Execution Date | date |
DATE |
string, format: date |
Date | 2026-10-01 |
Select Options
Evaluated Agent Model
Use the exact evaluated model/provider/deployment revision; examples are not an availability allowlist.
Benchmark Suite Domain
SWE-bench Verified | WebArena | AgentBench | HumanEval-Rust | Web3AuditBench
Regression Verdict
Improved with evidence | No demonstrated change | Regressed with evidence | Inconclusive
Measurement procedure
Record an immutable run identifier, suite revision, task IDs, model/runtime/tool settings, completed/failed/skipped counts and actual charges. Derive pass rate from eligible completed outcomes under a declared denominator; tool hallucination needs a defined invalid-call denominator. For a regression verdict, use paired outcomes or a justified test and interval, and retain an inconclusive state. Labels and example values below are synthetic, not measured results. Define any relation field in every emitted format only when the target exists and is confirmed.
Relations
Audit Reference-> links to the formal review documentation or test repository.Target Architecture-> links to the deployed contract or autonomous agent runtime component.
Examples
Prompt
How do I configure and track AI Agent Capability Evaluation & Benchmarking for our production environment?
Recommended Next Step
Generate the unified field schema, SQL DDL migration, and JSON validation schema to register into your system catalog.
Workflow: Define criteria -> Run automated verification -> Record baseline -> Monitor invariants.
Best Practices
- Enforce strict typing on numerical bounds and currency amounts; avoid unstructured free-text fields for critical states.
- Re-run validation test suites on every state-altering commit or parameter change.
- Keep example data synthetic and isolated from production cryptographic keys or private endpoints.
Limitations
- This register does not execute benchmarks, prove compliance or need on-chain RPC credentials. An actual authorized harness and evaluation evidence are external prerequisites.
…
FAQ
What are 'tool hallucination rates'?
It's the percentage of times the AI agent tried to use a tool incorrectly or unnecessarily.
What does 'cost per solved task' mean?
It's the average amount spent on computation for the AI agent to successfully complete a task.
Does this tool run the evaluation tests?
No, it only helps record and organize the results of tests you have already performed.
Details
Original description by the author
Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.
Popularity
- GitHub stars
- 48k
- Ranking position
- #2081
- License
- MIT
- Updated
- 10/15/2026
Comments
- …
More skills from this repository
00-andruia-consultant
Helps your agent start or improve AI projects. It analyzes code, suggests tools, and creates action plans in Spanish.
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
007
Lets your agent perform security audits and threat modeling. It's useful for protecting projects against attacks and vulnerabilities.
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
10-andruia-skill-smith
Helps your agent create or improve AI tools. It defines how tools work, writes documentation, and validates the structure.
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
20-andruia-niche-intelligence
Lets your agent create a summary about a specific industry. It's useful for understanding the context, rules, usage patterns, and risks of a project, using reliable sources.
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Similar skills
agent-architecture-audit
Makes your agent check if everything is working correctly. It finds and fixes problems in AI systems, ensuring they perform as expected.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-eval
Helps your agent compare different AI coding tools. It measures which one is faster, cheaper, and more reliable for specific tasks.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-harness-construction
Makes your agent better understand how to perform tasks. It optimizes the tools and instructions the agent uses to increase its chances of success.
affaan-m/ECC