Skip to content
Skillpedia
Agents48k · #2081

ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking

Helps evaluate AI agents on tasks. Checks if they complete requests, plan well, and use tools correctly. Shows costs. Useful for comparing agent performance and efficiency.

What it does

This tool helps record and compare the performance of different artificial intelligence programs (agents). It measures how well they complete tasks, how accurate they are in using other tools, and how much they cost.

When to use it

  • ✓When recording test results for an AI agent with a fixed dataset.
  • ✓When comparing a new agent to an existing one under the same conditions.
  • ✓When creating checklists in formats like CSV or SQL to track performance.

Example of what to ask your AI

“How can I record and compare the performance of our AI agents?”

Want more? Open the sections below.

How to use

The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.

Skill link

https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/blob/main/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking/SKILL.md

Ready-to-paste message

Use this skill to help me: https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/blob/main/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking/SKILL.md Read the SKILL.md file at that link and follow its instructions for my task.
How it works

You define the evaluation criteria and parameters. Then, the tool helps export the results in standardized formats (like tables or database schemas) for analysis.

Installation

Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.

In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:

npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking

Or download just the file:

curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/main/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/ai-agent-evaluation-benchmarking/SKILL.md -o SKILL.md
Technical content (original SKILL.md)

Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.

AI Agent Capability Evaluation & Benchmarking

What it is: Standardizes multi-metric capability benchmarking, token cost efficiency, and regression monitoring across autonomous coding agents.

Overview

Provides a standardized, auditable framework and data model for AI Agent Capability Evaluation & Benchmarking operations across distributed engineering and decentralized application systems.

When to Use This Skill

  • When recording agent evaluation runs with a fixed dataset, rubric, runtime/model revision and measured outcomes.
  • When comparing a candidate with a baseline under matched tasks, environment, tool permissions and cost accounting.
  • When generating reproducible CSV, SQL DDL, JSON Schema, and Notion property registers for tracking compliance.

How It Works

  1. Define the parameters, thresholds, and identity bindings required for the target operational register.
  2. Select appropriate boundary enforcement values from validated enum select sets.
  3. Export standardized artifacts (CSV table, SQL DDL, JSON Schema) to integrate into validation CI pipelines.

Field Reference

# Field Name Type SQL Type JSON Schema Type Notion Property Type Example Value
1 Benchmark Run ID id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY integer Text 1
2 Evaluated Agent Model select VARCHAR(64) string Select Claude 3.7 Sonnet
3 Benchmark Suite Domain select VARCHAR(64) string Select SWE-bench Verified
4 Tasks Evaluated Count number INTEGER integer Number 100
5 Pass Rate Percentage number NUMERIC(5,2) number Number 78.40
6 Tool Hallucination Rate % number NUMERIC(5,2) number Number 0.60
7 Average Tokens Per Task number INTEGER integer Number 42500
8 Cost Per Solved Task USD currency NUMERIC(8,4) number Number 0.3420
9 Regression Verdict select VARCHAR(32) string Select Superior
10 Evaluation Lead text VARCHAR(64) string Text Ranjeet2063
11 Benchmark Execution Date date DATE string, format: date Date 2026-10-01

Select Options

Evaluated Agent Model

Use the exact evaluated model/provider/deployment revision; examples are not an availability allowlist.

Benchmark Suite Domain

SWE-bench Verified | WebArena | AgentBench | HumanEval-Rust | Web3AuditBench

Regression Verdict

Improved with evidence | No demonstrated change | Regressed with evidence | Inconclusive

Measurement procedure

Record an immutable run identifier, suite revision, task IDs, model/runtime/tool settings, completed/failed/skipped counts and actual charges. Derive pass rate from eligible completed outcomes under a declared denominator; tool hallucination needs a defined invalid-call denominator. For a regression verdict, use paired outcomes or a justified test and interval, and retain an inconclusive state. Labels and example values below are synthetic, not measured results. Define any relation field in every emitted format only when the target exists and is confirmed.

Relations

  • Audit Reference -> links to the formal review documentation or test repository.
  • Target Architecture -> links to the deployed contract or autonomous agent runtime component.

Examples

Prompt

How do I configure and track AI Agent Capability Evaluation & Benchmarking for our production environment?

Recommended Next Step

Generate the unified field schema, SQL DDL migration, and JSON validation schema to register into your system catalog.

Workflow: Define criteria -> Run automated verification -> Record baseline -> Monitor invariants.

Best Practices

  • Enforce strict typing on numerical bounds and currency amounts; avoid unstructured free-text fields for critical states.
  • Re-run validation test suites on every state-altering commit or parameter change.
  • Keep example data synthetic and isolated from production cryptographic keys or private endpoints.

Limitations

  • This register does not execute benchmarks, prove compliance or need on-chain RPC credentials. An actual authorized harness and evaluation evidence are external prerequisites.

…

FAQ

What are 'tool hallucination rates'?

It's the percentage of times the AI agent tried to use a tool incorrectly or unnecessarily.

What does 'cost per solved task' mean?

It's the average amount spent on computation for the AI agent to successfully complete a task.

Does this tool run the evaluation tests?

No, it only helps record and organize the results of tests you have already performed.

Details

Original description by the author

Autonomous AI agent benchmark evaluation register: task completion rates, planning accuracy, tool invocation precision, and cost benchmarks.

repo: sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Popularity

GitHub stars
48k
Ranking position
#2081
License
MIT
Updated
10/15/2026

Is this skill useful?

0

Sign in to vote.

Comments

  • …

More skills from this repository

Similar skills