Skip to content
Skillpedia
Testing48k · #3485

logic-lens

Performs a deep code review using logic. It finds bugs, bad patterns, and security risks that normal tools miss.

What it does

This tool analyzes your code to find logic and security errors that other tools might miss. It checks if the code behaves as expected, even in complex situations.

When to use it

  • ✓Before merging new code into a larger project (PR review).
  • ✓When a bug is hard to find and regular tools aren't helping.
  • ✓When reviewing security-sensitive code sections (like logins or payments).

Example of what to ask your AI

“Review my code for logic and security flaws.”

Want more? Open the sections below.

How to use

The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.

Skill link

https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/blob/main/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/logic-lens/SKILL.md

Ready-to-paste message

Use this skill to help me: https://github.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/blob/main/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/logic-lens/SKILL.md Read the SKILL.md file at that link and follow its instructions for my task.
How it works

The tool reads your code, understands data flow, and applies logical rules to find issues. It checks over 9 types of risks, such as calculation errors or security vulnerabilities.

Installation

Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.

In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:

npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill logic-lens

Or download just the file:

curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/main/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/logic-lens/SKILL.md -o SKILL.md
Technical content (original SKILL.md)

Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.

Logic Lens

Overview

Logic Lens is a Claude Code skill that performs deep, logic-driven code review using formal reasoning frameworks. Unlike traditional linters that check syntax and style, Logic Lens analyzes your code for logical errors, race conditions, security vulnerabilities, type mismatches, and algorithmic flaws that only appear when you reason through the code's behavior.

Powered by structured AI analysis, Logic Lens applies systematic logical inspection across 9 risk categories: null/undefined handling, type safety, concurrency, resource management, security injection, boundary conditions, algorithm correctness, state management, and API contract violations.

When to Use This Skill

  • Use when you want a thorough logic review before merging a PR
  • Use when a bug seems hard to find and standard linters aren't helping
  • Use when reviewing security-sensitive code paths (auth, payments, file access)
  • Use when refactoring complex business logic
  • Use when onboarding to a new codebase and need to understand risk areas

How It Works

Logic Lens uses Claude Code's reasoning capabilities to:

  1. Parse code structure and build a mental model of data flow
  2. Apply formal logic checks across 9 risk categories
  3. Trace execution paths for edge cases and boundary conditions
  4. Identify security anti-patterns (injection, privilege escalation, data leakage)
  5. Report findings with severity levels and actionable fix suggestions

Installation

# Install via Claude Code plugin marketplace
# Search: "logic-lens" in Claude Code > Extensions

# Or install via NPX (Antigravity)
npx agentic-awesome-skills --claude
# Then invoke: @logic-lens

Examples

Example 1: Review a Single File

@logic-lens review src/auth/login.ts for security issues

Logic Lens output:

[CRITICAL] SQL Injection risk at line 42: user input concatenated into query string
[HIGH] Missing rate limiting on login attempts
[MEDIUM] Password comparison uses == instead of timing-safe comparison
[LOW] Error messages may leak valid usernames (user enumeration)

Example 2: Full Repository Scan

@logic-lens scan the entire codebase and prioritize by severity

Example 3: Pre-PR Review

@logic-lens review all files changed in this branch before I open a PR

The 9 Risk Categories

Category What It Checks
Null/Undefined Missing null checks, optional chaining gaps
Type Safety Implicit coercions, any-typed boundaries
Concurrency Race conditions, shared mutable state
Resource Management Unclosed handles, memory leaks
Security Injection SQL/XSS/Command injection, path traversal
Boundary Conditions Off-by-one errors, integer overflow
Algorithm Correctness Wrong complexity, incorrect assumptions
State Management Inconsistent state, missing rollbacks
API Contracts Undocumented side effects, broken interfaces

Best Practices

  • Run @logic-lens on authentication and payment code before every release
  • Combine with @lint-and-validate for full coverage: style + logic
  • Review the CRITICAL and HIGH findings first; LOW findings can be deferred
  • Use @logic-lens on legacy code you are about to modify to understand risk surface

Benchmark Results

Logic Lens was tested against real-world codebases and caught issues missed by ESLint, TypeScript strict mode, and Snyk:

  • 47% of critical bugs found were invisible to linters
  • Race conditions detected in async code that static analysis missed
  • Security vulnerabilities identified before deployment in CI pipeline

Related Skills

  • @lint-and-validate — Complementary: run after logic-lens for style/syntax
  • @security-auditor — Specialized security-only deep scan
  • @debugging-strategies — Use when logic-lens findings need tracing

Additional Resources

Limitations

…

FAQ

What's the difference between this tool and a 'linter'?

Linters check code formatting and basic syntax errors. This tool goes deeper, analyzing internal logic and code behavior to find more complex problems.

What kinds of issues can it find?

It can find errors in how the code handles null values, security issues like code injection, problems with concurrency (when multiple things happen at once), and calculation mistakes.

Does it replace a human reviewer?

No, it's a powerful assistant. Its analysis should be combined with a review by an experienced programmer, especially for critical decisions.

Details

Original description by the author

AI-powered Claude Code skill that performs deep code review using formal logic and reasoning frameworks to detect bugs, anti-patterns, and security risks beyond what linters catch.

repo: sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills

Popularity

GitHub stars
48k
Ranking position
#3485
License
MIT
Updated
10/15/2026

Is this skill useful?

0

Sign in to vote.

Comments

  • …

More skills from this repository

Similar skills