review-swarm
Helps your agent review code in parallel. It looks for errors that could cause behavioral, security, or performance issues in the program.
What it does
This tool reviews changes in your code to find issues. It uses multiple 'agents' (small AI helpers) that look at the code in parallel, each focusing on a type of problem (like security or performance), to ensure everything works well and is risk-free.
When to use it
- ✓When you've made code changes and want to ensure nothing broke.
- ✓Before merging your changes into the main project to prevent issues.
- ✓If you suspect a new change might have introduced a security or performance risk.
Example of what to ask your AI
“Review the latest changes in my code for security and performance issues.”
Want more? Open the sections below.
How to use
The easiest way: copy the message below and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or any AI. It reads the skill and follows the instructions.
Skill link
Ready-to-paste message
How it works
The tool divides the work among four AI helpers. Each checks a specific aspect of the code (like security, performance, etc.). Then, a main agent gathers all findings, filters out less important ones, and presents a summary of the most relevant issues.
Installation
Easiest way: copy the skill link and paste it into Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor asking it to follow the instructions.
In the terminal (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor), in your project folder:
npx skills add sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills --skill review-swarmOr download just the file:
curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills/main/plugins/agentic-awesome-skills-claude/skills/review-swarm/SKILL.md -o SKILL.mdTechnical content (original SKILL.md)
Original text by the author, straight from GitHub.
Review Swarm
When to Use
Use this skill when you need parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps. Use when the user asks for a review swarm, parallel review, diff review,...
Review a diff with four read-only sub-agents in parallel, then have the main agent filter, order, and summarize only the issues that matter. This skill is review-only: sub-agents do not edit files, and the main agent does not apply fixes as part of this workflow.
Step 1: Determine Scope and Intent
Prefer this scope order:
- Files or paths explicitly named by the user
- Current git changes
- An explicit branch, commit, or PR diff requested by the user
- Most recently modified tracked files, only if the user asked for a review and there is no clearer diff
If there is no clear review scope, stop and say so briefly.
When using git changes, choose the smallest correct diff command:
- unstaged work:
git diff - staged work:
git diff --cached - mixed staged and unstaged work: review both
- explicit branch or commit comparison: use exactly what the user requested
Before launching reviewers, read the closest local instructions and any relevant project docs for the touched area, such as:
AGENTS.md- repo workflow docs
- architecture or contract docs for the touched module
Build a short intent packet for the reviewers:
- What behavior is meant to change
- What behavior should remain unchanged
- Any stated or inferred constraints, such as compatibility, rollout, security, or migration expectations
If the user did not state the intent clearly, infer it from the diff and say that the inference may be incomplete.
Step 2: Launch Four Read-Only Reviewers in Parallel
Launch four sub-agents when the scope is large enough for parallel review to help. For a tiny diff or one very small file, it is acceptable to review locally instead.
For every sub-agent:
- give the same scope and the same intent packet
- state that the sub-agent is read-only
- do not let the sub-agent edit files, run
apply_patch, stage changes, commit, or perform any other state-mutating action - ask for concise findings only
- ask for: file and line or symbol, issue, why it matters, recommended follow-up, and confidence
- tell the sub-agent to avoid nits, style preferences, and speculative concerns without concrete impact
- tell the sub-agent to send findings back to the main agent only
Use these four review roles.
Sub-Agent 1: Intent and Regression Review
Review whether the diff matches the intended behavior change without introducing extra behavior drift.
Check for:
- Unintended behavior changes outside the stated scope
- Broken edge cases or fallback paths
- Contract drift between callers and callees
- Missing updates to adjacent flows that should change together
This sub-agent is read-only. It must not edit files, apply patches, or make any other workspace changes.
Recommended sub-agent role: reviewer
Sub-Agent 2: Security and Privacy Review
Review the diff for security regressions, privacy risks, and trust-boundary mistakes.
Check for:
- Missing or weakened authn or authz checks
- Unsafe input handling, injection risks, or validation gaps
- Secret, token, or sensitive data exposure
- Risky defaults, permission expansion, or trust of unverified data
This sub-agent is read-only. It must not edit files, apply patches, or make any other workspace changes.
Recommended sub-agent role: reviewer
Sub-Agent 3: Performance and Reliability Review
Review the diff for new cost, fragility, or operational risk.
Check for:
- Duplicate work, redundant I/O, or unnecessary recomputation
- Added work on startup, render, request, or other hot paths
- Leaks, missing cleanup, retry storms, or subscription drift
- Ordering, race, or failure-handling problems that make the change brittle
This sub-agent is read-only. It must not edit files, apply patches, or make any other workspace changes.
Recommended sub-agent role: reviewer
Sub-Agent 4: Contracts and Coverage Review
Review the diff for compatibility gaps and missing safety nets.
Check for:
- API, schema, type, config, or feature-flag mismatches
- Migration or backward-compatibility fallout
- Missing or weak tests for the changed behavior
…
FAQ
What is a 'git diff'?
It's a command that shows the differences between two versions of your code. It's like seeing what you've changed.
Can the AI agents change my code?
No, they only read and analyze. They do not make any changes to your code.
What happens if there are no issues?
If no significant issues are found, the tool will state that there are no material issues to report.
Details
Original description by the author
Parallel read-only multi-agent review of a current git diff or explicit file scope to find behavioral regressions, security or privacy risks, performance or reliability issues, and contract or test coverage gaps.
Popularity
- GitHub stars
- 48k
- Ranking position
- #4021
- License
- MIT
- Updated
- 10/15/2026
Comments
- …
More skills from this repository
00-andruia-consultant
Helps your agent start or improve AI projects. It analyzes code, suggests tools, and creates action plans in Spanish.
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
007
Lets your agent perform security audits and threat modeling. It's useful for protecting projects against attacks and vulnerabilities.
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
10-andruia-skill-smith
Helps your agent create or improve AI tools. It defines how tools work, writes documentation, and validates the structure.
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
20-andruia-niche-intelligence
Lets your agent create a summary about a specific industry. It's useful for understanding the context, rules, usage patterns, and risks of a project, using reliable sources.
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills
Similar skills
agent-architecture-audit
Makes your agent check if everything is working correctly. It finds and fixes problems in AI systems, ensuring they perform as expected.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-eval
Helps your agent compare different AI coding tools. It measures which one is faster, cheaper, and more reliable for specific tasks.
affaan-m/ECC
agent-harness-construction
Makes your agent better understand how to perform tasks. It optimizes the tools and instructions the agent uses to increase its chances of success.
affaan-m/ECC